バルベルト™ 緑内障 インプラント
![rtb1_image_desktop.png rtb1_image_desktop.png](https://surgical.jnjvision.jp/sites/surgical_jp/files/public/rtb1-desktop5%281%29.png)
![rtb1_image_mobile.png rtb1_image_mobile.png](https://surgical.jnjvision.jp/sites/surgical_jp/files/public/rtb1-mobile6%281%29.png)
References:
1. Gedde S, Schiffman J, Feuer W, et al. Treatment outcomes in the tube versus trabeculectomy study after one year of follow-up. Am J Ophthalmol.2007;143(1):9-22.
2. Lloyd MA, Baerveldt G, Fellenbaum PS, et al. Intermediate-term results of a randomized clinical trial of the 350 - versus the 500 mm2 Baerveldt Implant. Ophthalmology. 1994;101(8):1456-1464.
3. Fellenbaum PS, Sidoti P, Heuer DK, Minckler DS, Baerveldt G, Lee PP. Experience with the Baerveldt implant in young patients with complicated glaucomas. J Glaucoma. 1995;4(2):91-97.
4. Heuer DK, Lloyd MA, Abrams DA, et al. Which is better? One or two? A randomized clinical trial of single-plate versus double-plate Molteno implantation for glaucomas in aphakia and pseudophakia. Ophthalmology. 1992;99(10):1512-1519.
5. Hodkin MJ, Goldblatt WS, Burgoyne CF, et al. Early clinical experience with the Baerveldt implant in complicated glaucomas. Am J Ophthalmol. 1995;120(1):32-40.